Sample Metadata Record
<olac:olac>
<dc:title>Three Pieces of Kui Text</dc:title>
<dc:creator>KATUBI</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>SHIOHARA, Asako</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>BESIKARI, Iwan</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2021-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:format xsi:type="dcterms:IMT">audio/x-wav</dc:format>
<dc:format xsi:type="dcterms:IMT">application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:format>論文(Article)</dc:format>
<dc:identifier xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://tufs.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1595</dc:identifier>
<dc:language xsi:type="olac:language" olac:code="kvd"/>
<dc:publisher>アジア・アフリカ言語文化研究所</dc:publisher>
<dc:type xsi:type="olac:linguistic-type" olac:code="primary_text"/>
</olac:olac>
| Title | Three Pieces of Kui Text |
| Creator | KATUBI |
| Creator | SHIOHARA, Asako |
| Creator | BESIKARI, Iwan |
| Date | 2021-03-31 |
| Format (IMT) | audio/x-wav |
| Format (IMT) | application/pdf |
| Format | 論文(Article) |
| Identifier (URI) | https://tufs.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1595 |
| Language (ISO639-3) | Kui (Indonesia) [kvd] |
| Publisher | アジア・アフリカ言語文化研究所 |
| Type (OLAC) | Linguistic type: Primary text |
OLAC metadata records are scored for metadata quality on a 10-point scale explained in OLAC Metadata Metrics. The score for the above record (along with comments on changes that could improve the score) is as follows:
| Component | + | - | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title | 1 | 0 | |
| Date | 1 | 0 | |
| Agent | 1 | 0 | |
| About | 0 | 1 | Add a dc:description or dc:subject or dcterms:abstract or dcterms:tableOfContents element. |
| Depth | 0.67 | 0.33 | For the full score, add at least 2 more elements in addition to the ones counted explicitly in other components of the score. |
| Content Language | 1 | 0 | |
| Subject Language | 1 | 0 | |
| OLAC Type | 1 | 0 | |
| DCMI Type | 0 | 1 | Add a dc:type element that uses the DCMIType encoding scheme to identify the generic type of the resource. |
| Precision | 0.67 | 0.33 | For the full score, make use of at least one more encoding scheme in addition to the ones counted explicitly in other components of
the score. For instance,
|
| Quality score | 7.33 | ||